Re: You rate savannah.gnu.org at A? AYFKM?

[S T]

Hello,

I don't think FSF has the capacity to provide perfect accessibility for all GNU 
software and conferences it runs. I believe they are willing to make 
improvements in this direction, *infrastructure*-wise. As far as I know, 
*content* - keynotes, transcripts, software, software documentation - is 
provided by volunteers. I hope my understanding is correct. (This is how 
Wikimedia Foundation does it. I presume it is also true for what FSF does. I 
haven't seen it documented as an official policy.)

For example, I checked about Libreplanet, turns out that the videos subtitles 
are written by volunteers here 
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/LibrePlanet:Conference/2020/Transcripts - and the 
FSF wrote to me that they will consider improvements to the process to make it 
easier to discover and to use, so that the transcription does not take so many 
years.

If there is anything in GNU Savannah that causes it to lack accessibility, 
please let someone know, as it is a piece of infrastructure hosted by FSF, and 
improvements are possible.

Similarly, the page 'repo evaluation criteria' is written by volunteers to a 
large extent. If you have a list of specific "awesome accessibility" points 
that you think should be added as criteria, I expect that they would probably 
be considered here.

Thanks,
S