Re: You rate savannah.gnu.org at A? AYFKM?

[Pau Amma]

On 2022-02-18 11:33, Adam Faiz wrote:
> On 16/02/2022 01:01, Pau Amma <pauamma@gundo.com> wrote:
> > I went from https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
> > to https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.html and saw this utter
> > BS:
> >
> > - Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0)
> > standard. (A+3)
> >
> > - Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet
> > Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)
> >
> > Newsflash, you ableist jerks: not following those alone makes anything
> > an F, no matter what else they do or not. Did you design your fucking
> > self-serving "ethical" standards just so you could brag about it and 
> > it
> > alone getting an A?
>
> I think you misunderstood how the repo criteria evaluation works. A
> repository is only graded an 'F' if it doesn't meet the 'C' criteria.

I think you're deliberately dodging my point. I'm not saying it's not 
working the way it's designed - I actually have no opinion of that, nor 
do I care beyond noting your strawman in passing. I'm saying the way 
it's designed is self-serving, hypocritical, and aiming at earning 
savannah an A and nothing else more than a B.

--
English: he/him/his (singular they/them/their/theirs OK)
French: il/le/lui (iel/iel and ielle/ielle OK)
Tagalog: siya/niya/kaniya (please avoid sila/nila/kanila)