[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gitlab C2
From: |
Greg Farough |
Subject: |
Re: Gitlab C2 |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Nov 2021 11:18:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, Oct 31 2021, bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 19:42:49 +1100 Svetlana wrote:
>> I guess the issue can also be checked with an open proxy or repeated
>> cycling of tor nodes,
>
> right - not impossible, but non-trivial to confirm (aka: a PITA)
> - i have seen two such complaints recently; so i am inclined to
> believe it - i suppose it depends on how much evidence convinces
> whoever makes the final decisions
>
> @rms @greg - how much evidence would be enough to verify C2? - is
> one person's complaint enough? - two people? - should someone
> demonstrate that the "tor roulette" game can confirm it?
I think two people is enough to confirm it. As Tor nodes or VPN
addresses might be blocked for other reasons, though, it would be
helpful to see if someone on a normal Iranian residential address has
the same problem. But I don't think that's strictly necessary.
So maybe one more result confirming this?
-g
--
Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Gitlab C2, Pedram Ashofteh Ardakani, 2021/11/01
- Re: Gitlab C2,
Greg Farough <=
- Re: Gitlab C2, Richard Stallman, 2021/11/02
- Re: Gitlab C2, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2021/11/02
- Re: Gitlab C2, Richard Stallman, 2021/11/04
- Re: Gitlab C2, Marcos Marado, 2021/11/05
- Re: Gitlab C2, bill-auger, 2021/11/05
- Re: Gitlab C2, bill-auger, 2021/11/05
- Re: Gitlab C2, Richard Stallman, 2021/11/05
Re: Gitlab C2, Richard Stallman, 2021/11/01
Re: Gitlab C2, Richard Stallman, 2021/11/01