[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gitlab C2
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: Gitlab C2 |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:11:14 -0400 |
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 19:43:35 +1100 Svetlana wrote:
> Perhaps this also means different ratings need to be given to gitlab.com and
> to the gitlab software,
> since the gitlab software probably does not have country wide blocks like
> that?
right again - it is probably not part of the forge software; but
a peculiar network configuration of that specific host
along with the new changes to the rankings, a new project was
approved to focus on the (objective) libre properties of various
self-hosting forge softwares, rather than the (subjective)
ethics of specific hosts; and hosts are now presented by domain
name (eg: 'gitlab.com'), to distinguish from the similarly named
software (eg: 'gitlab'), which may be on the self-hosting forges
list with different criteria
o/c it will need volunteers to write the criteria and evaluate
some forges; but it is a good direction to focus on into the
future
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-07/msg00014.html
- Gitlab C2, Pedram Ashofteh Ardakani, 2021/10/30