Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4

[hi]

28 Jun 2021 22:18:32 bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community>:

> On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:30:48 -0400 Richard wrote:
>> We don't object to publishing under CC-BY-ND.
>
> to be clear, the no-derivatives CC licenses and the
> non-commercial CC licenses are both permitted 'sharing'
> licenses?
>
> if those are permitted, every license of which i am familiar,
> would qualify as a sharing license - to be clear, how does
> 'nonsharing' differ with 'proprietary'?

Nonsharing is nonfree. So are any cc licenses with nc or nd restrictions. So 
the only free cc licenses are cc0, cc by and cc by sa.

>
> is 'nonsharing' defined elsewhere on gnu.org? - maybe these
> could link to definitions of 'nonfree' and 'nonsharing'?