Re: [PATCH]: criteria C5

[bill-auger]

On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:34:45 -0400 bill-auger wrote:
> the proposed B1.9 requires good licensing documentation - even
> if that is accepted though, this criteria is at the 'C' level,
> yet is essentially taking for granted that B1.9 is satisfied

... or "Recommends and encourages" _some_ license

i could have concluded better - i suppose that the forge could
"Recommend and encourage" certain licenses, without explaining
them well, at the 'C' level

the rewording was intended as a clarification, so to
disambiguate the false interpretation, that forges are expected
to recommend, or mention, any license, at the 'C' level

note there there is becoming some overlap across levels with C5,
B2.1, and A3 - at which level should adequate licensing
documentation be required?