Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org

[bill-auger]

On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:53:02 -0400 Richard wrote:
> Can you get a final evaluation ready for any of the sites we
> have been looking at?

yes - i have been reviewing all of the discussion on this list
since march, and condensed them into a summary report - there
were about 20 different topics discussed, across a small number
of threads, which was confusing to people - it took quite some
time to compile a summary - hopefully that will serve get sort
out the issues and put the separate discussions on track - it
includes several items which could be made into concrete
patches, or implemented by the GNU webmasters immediately

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-05/msg00000.html

as for the new entries, at this point, there is enough verified
information to add both notabug.org and sr.ht

the wiki checklists serve well, both as a final evaluation, and
to as a central reference to assist with future re-evaluations

* adding notabug.org
  -> conclusion: affirmative, grade 'C'
     note: only a trivial bug is preventing grade 'B'
     per: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Notabug

* adding sr.ht
  -> conclusion: affirmative, grade 'B'
     per: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Sourcehut