[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:47:49 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> PASS - C5 - Recommends GPLv3-or-later
> it has been previously determined on this mailing list, that
> this requirement does not apply to most forges - most forges do
> not recommend _any_ licenses - they simply offer (optionally) to
> install a license file, from a pre-defined set,
This seems to be a miscommunication. GitHub does recommend licenses.
It offers a list of licenses when you start a project, and says good
and bad things about them.
Do we need to clarify the description of C5?
> ???? - A3 - Offers AGPLv3-or-later
> for the reason described in C5, no forge does this (not even
> savannah)
Is that a similar miscommunication?
Do we need to clarify the description of A3?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/03/23
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/03/31
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/03/31
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/03/31
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Hein-Pieter van Braam-Stewart, 2021/03/31
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org (re-send from the correct email address), Hein-Pieter van Braam-Stewart, 2021/03/31