[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Gitea assessment: C5
|
From: |
bill-auger |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Gitea assessment: C5 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Nov 2017 02:09:34 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
On 11/01/2017 08:48 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> the authors probably intended this to fail B3 but not C5.
yes, i quite think that is the intention
On 11/01/2017 08:48 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:> It's not clear to me from
this whether whether "GPL-3.0" dropdown
> results in the project being licenced (i) GPLv3-only or (ii) GPLv3+.
it does neither - these selectors can only at the most add a GPL license
to the repo - the GPL license itself does not specify "this or any later
version" - that is specified explicitly by the authors, for example, in
the headers of each individual source file
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature