[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Include Gogs (Notabug.org) for consideration
From: |
bill |
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Include Gogs (Notabug.org) for consideration |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:21:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
hello -
i joined this list today to suggest notabug for review and was pleased to find
that it is being considered already even if the first grade as an F this is a
good start
i found notabug about two months ago and it struck me right off as laden with
potential but not yet viable - i have since gottem familiar with the community
which is well aware of notabug's shortcomings - they explained to me that
notabug and the freepost blog they operate are non-commercial community-driven
projects - the admin is graciously providing the server but does not have the
time to properly maintain it alone - they forked the gogs project when it ws
very immature and buggy and the upstream has made great advances since but
notabug has mot been able to keep up
this is very unfortunate because the site is actually getting quite a bit of
lip-service around free-software circles because the community surrounding the
site is very libre-concious - there would be absolutely no resistance against
totally liberating the site if someone took the initiative to make it happen
the unique niche i see for notabug is that savanah is currently the only well
known code host that is libre-concious but most people find savanah daunting
and lacking in asthetics - this is not an important criteria for me but it is
for many people - gogs has been styled after github with it's emotes and large
shiny buttons screaming "push me, push me" and this is very familiar and
appealing factor for many especially the younger ones - yet notabug shares the
same philosphy with the FSF, GNU, and savanah such as allowing only the
fsf-endored free licences - the few modifications that they have made were
mainly concerned with removing the non-free bits such as slack integration
so myself having some skills and some time i offered to upgrade the site to the
latest upstream in order to fix most of the bugs with the alterior motive of
studying the codebase to see what it would take to fully librate it -
personally i would like to see notabug be the first code host aside from
savanah to earn an A libre-rating (ha get it? libre...rating) and im quite
certain i could get the whole community to endorse that goal
not to bore with details but i spent the past week boning up on the go language
to get prepared and have begun the upgrade - this should be complete in perhaps
as soon as a week and i am confident that the site will fare much better upon
the next review - after this is done my plan is been to liberate the js and
then consult you guys for advice on going the last mile to meet the highest FSF
standards - i hope you guys will help me get behind this little pony so there
can be at least one other shining example of an "Ethical Repository" to point
at (and one that the kids will like too) - you are welcome to monitor my
progress here https://notabug.org/bill-auger/gogs/issues - and feel free to
join #freepost on freenode to meet the community