Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Evaluation: F for git.pantsu.cat

[Mike Gerwitz]

Hey, Juuso:

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:15:46 +0000, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> I did an evaluation on git.pantsu.cat. It's a very small Git service,
> primarily concerned with its own free software projects but also hosts
> user repositories on request. If we're concerned about notability, it
> lacks notability. In summary, its ethical repository grade is an F.
> Here's some Markdown-like evaluation:

Thanks for the evaluation---very comprehensive!  Sorry for the delayed
reply.


Zak: As Juuso noted, this is a small service; are we good with including
any service that someone is willing to help evaluate?  I think it'd be a
good idea, but list the most high-profile ones first.

If so, I can look over the evaluations and modify the page and send it
to the GNU Webmasters as they come in.  But we don't have any formal
process in place yet.

-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature