[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Defining C6 (HTTPS) more precisely
|
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Defining C6 (HTTPS) more precisely |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:06:01 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:00:28 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Quoting criteria C6:
>> Support HTTPS properly and securely, including the site's certificates. (C6)
>
> "properly and securely" seems rather vague. I think we should spell out
> exactly what we expect. Suggested wording:
rms wanted to keep the criteria short; a number of them were stripped
down. It could be worth adding clarifications elsewhere.
Zak: I don't recall the details; did he object to clarification
elsewhere? I think he preferred to be vague and let evaluators decide
on a case-by-case basis.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature