[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] repo-criteria-evaluation
|
From: |
Yui Hirasawa |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] repo-criteria-evaluation |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:42:10 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
> Please include mention of the fact that source forge inserted viruses into
> program installers. For this they should be marked lower than F!
You can't really fault the current owners for what a previous owner did.
Sourceforge was recently acquired by some other company and at least
they said that they'll fix things. I don't know if they actually have,
at least they should be given a chance.
> Also a minor point: github has added a new 'block' feature that bars people
> from forking a repo (even if it is GPL3).
That is really unfortunate but you can just get around it by cloning,
making a repo and pushing to that.