repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak


From: Mike Gerwitz
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:18:03 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Hey, John:

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:23:06 +0100, Andrew Ferguson 500 wrote:
> One thing: the current evaluation of GitHub has "They push people toward
> GPLv2, undermining GPLv3 adoption" as a note. From what John was saying
> earlier, hasn't this changed (and if so, should this be changed in the
> evaluation - or would that require the whole of GitHub to be re-evaluated
> again?).

What are your opinions on choosealicense.org as it relates to the GNU
ethical repository criteria?  Specifically, in the spirit of C5.

-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]