[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})} |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:18:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Hey, John:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:23:06 +0100, Andrew Ferguson 500 wrote:
> One thing: the current evaluation of GitHub has "They push people toward
> GPLv2, undermining GPLv3 adoption" as a note. From what John was saying
> earlier, hasn't this changed (and if so, should this be changed in the
> evaluation - or would that require the whole of GitHub to be re-evaluated
> again?).
What are your opinions on choosealicense.org as it relates to the GNU
ethical repository criteria? Specifically, in the spirit of C5.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/07
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/11
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Andrew Ferguson 500, 2016/04/11
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})},
Mike Gerwitz <=
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/12
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/12
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Aaron Wolf, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Aaron Wolf, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/13