repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2)


From: John Sullivan
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:57:04 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Mike Gerwitz <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 00:43:33 +0000, Andrew Ferguson wrote:
>> I have also been in touch with GitHub customer support, and they don't seem
>> very interested / motivated in meeting the criteria ("Nor can I say that
>> meeting the criteria is on our roadmap for the foreseeable future") - not
>> that I'm particularly surprised by this response. Has anyone had any
>> success, or know anyone else I should contact?
>
> I have tried personally, and RMS has tried as well.  Neither of us had
> any success.  See:
>
>   https://mikegerwitz.com/about/githubbub
>
> Thank you for trying, though. :)
>

I have some open conversations with Github right now (see the related
recent improvements made to choosealicense.com -- now listing GPLv3,
GPLv3 example projects, and friendlier language about copyleft). I can
try to raise some issues related to the criteria if someone sends me a
brief bullet list in order of importance.

-john

-- 
John Sullivan | Executive Director, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 61A0963B | http://status.fsf.org/johns | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS

Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at
<http://my.fsf.org/join>.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]