[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak
|
From: |
Zak Rogoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})} |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:29:09 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
On 02/09/2016 11:03 PM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:38:06 -0500, Zak Rogoff wrote:
>> Before I list the tasks, I also wanted to ask: does anyone know
>> journalists or blogs that would might be interested in covering this?
>> Whether you have a contact or just know of someone who covers this area,
>> I'd like to hear.
>
> I don't, but at the least it might be worth a mention at LibrePlanet.
>
>> * Confirm with Sytse and Mike Gerwitz that the Gitlab evaluation is
>> ready to be published (if you two are reading this, feel free to just
>> respond right here!). If so, add that evaluation to the draft.
Great.
> Yes, it is ready. With that said, I'll need to dig up my last draft;
> I'll try to get that out in the next few days.
>
> I would love to help more, but my time is going to be very tight until
> after LibrePlanet, so I'm not sure if I can do much else in the
> timeframe that you're describing.
No worries, Mike.
--
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature