repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] ban of flash


From: Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] ban of flash
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:07:18 -0200

Hello Sandro!

Em Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:09:05 +0200
Sandro Santilli <address@hidden> escreveu:

> I've read the GNU ethical repository criteria and found point C1
> to be a bit misleading where it says "(thus, no Flash)", because
> a free software flash interpreter exists, and is actually a GNU
> package (and a priority project): http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash

I think the point is that we don't want to encourage the use of flash,
deeming it as acceptable. 


> Thank you for your effort, btw, really useful.

You're welcome.


> Do you also maintain a list of copatible hosting site ?

We are currently working on that --- expect it to be published soon.
The initial list of sites we are evaluating is: GNU Savannah, GitHub,
GitLab and SourceForge.


> The wikipedia has a page for that, which might be added a
> compatibility column (not sure that'd be appropriate):
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_source_code_hosting_facilities

As we are setting a new standard, I think this will eventually be done.
After we publish some evaluations, would you like to work on that?


-- 
 88888  FFFFF Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
 8   8  F     http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/
 88888  FFFF  mailto:address@hidden
 8   8  F     irc://chat.freenode.org/oitofelix
 88888  F     xmpp://address@hidden

- GNU ccd2cue maintainer
- GNU Savannah hacker
- GNU webmaster
- GNU audio and video maintainer
- GNU ethical repository criteria maintainer
- GNU web translation team coordinator (Brazilian Portuguese)
- DMOZ free software editor (Portuguese)
- UFU FAMAT PET member
- SDF Public Access UNIX System ARPA member
- Riseup user and supporter

Please, support my work: http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/funding.html

[GNU DISCLAIMER] I'm a GNU hacker, but my views don't necessarily
match those of the GNU project.  Hereby I express my own opinion,
style and perception, in good faith, aiming the betterment of GNU.

Attachment: pgp6IBWJPL3kS.pgp
Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]