|
From: | Dominic Raferd |
Subject: | Re: File Formats |
Date: | Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:01:33 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 |
On 27/03/2021 07:29, reg.rdiff_backup@excel4x.com wrote:
On 25.03.2021 09:29, reg.rdiff_backup@excel4x.com wrote:I just heard about rdiff-backup and I'm planning how toconfigure it.The documentation says: "Earlier states of your files are saved just by 1) keepinga copy ofthem, 2) in diff form as produced by rdiff, or 3) as a gzippedversion of 1 or 2."I see the --no-compression option to disable compression.However I donot see an option to produce copies of older files vs.storing them inrdiff format. How is the file format for older files controlled? Thanks much!Hello and welcome! I don't think it matters to you - it should be just a description of how rdiff-backup handles file history internally. --no-compression should disable compression of older files when a newer snapshot is created. It's sometimes useful to disable compression because gzip is rather CPU hungry and depending on files it can make the backup take a long time.
You can verify rdiff-backup repositories as a way to give you confidence. My approach to guard against disk error is to take a straightforward (rsync) backup of my rdiff-backup repositories but only after they are verified.Actually it does matter to me. I do not want to rely on a chain of reverse diffs to reconstruct important files. My concern is that a disk error could render reconstruction impossible. I would like every version to remain as a self-contained snapshot. So, I want to use compression and snapshots only. The documentation says that earlier states of files can be saved as copies or diffs. However there does not appear to be a run-time option to create copies. I looked at the python code in increment.py and it does not seem to have an option to create copies for regular files. Is there a way to force rdiff-backup to always create copies of earlier file versions?
But if you insist on atomic backups-in-time then maybe something like rsnapshot would be a better tool for you.
BTW the style here is to bottom-post.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |