[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version Woes
From: |
Robert Nichols |
Subject: |
Re: Version Woes |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:27:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
On 4/17/20 12:52 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Hi,
and one last comment: the migration guide from Patrik is meant for big
environments where you can't upgrade all rdiff-backup installations at
once. If you have only one server and one client, you can just upgrade
rdiff-backup on both sides following the readme and you're done.
KR, Eric
That's if you _can_ upgrade on both sides. I have CentOS 6 clients, and
their Python 3 version is 3.4.10, which is too old for rdiff-backup
2.0. The CentOS 8 server has to support both 1.2 and 2.0 clients,
regardless of what needs to be done to accomplish that.
--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.
- Version Woes, Brian Bouterse, 2020/04/14
- Re: Version Woes, Patrik Dufresne, 2020/04/14
- Re: Version Woes, Brian Bouterse, 2020/04/15
- Re: Version Woes, Frank Crawford, 2020/04/16
- Re: Version Woes, Brian Bouterse, 2020/04/17
- Re: Version Woes, ewl+rdiffbackup, 2020/04/17
- Re: Version Woes, ewl+rdiffbackup, 2020/04/17
- Re: Version Woes,
Robert Nichols <=
- Re: Version Woes, Frank Crawford, 2020/04/17
- Re: Version Woes, Robert Nichols, 2020/04/17
- Re: Version Woes, Frank Crawford, 2020/04/17
- Re: Version Woes, Derek Atkins, 2020/04/23
- Re: Version Woes, Frank Crawford, 2020/04/24
- Re: Version Woes, Derek Atkins, 2020/04/28
- Re: Version Woes, Derek Atkins, 2020/04/28
- Re: Version Woes, Tomas Pospisek, 2020/04/29
- Re: Version Woes, Derek Atkins, 2020/04/29
- Re: Version Woes, Frank Crawford, 2020/04/30