|
From: | Dominic Raferd |
Subject: | Re: [rdiff-backup-users] [PATCH] Sparse file support |
Date: | Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:33:14 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 03/01/2011 20:27, Eric Wheeler wrote:
So I guess it is forward-compatible, but not backward-compatible? Existing repositories can be read fine with rdiff-backup patched for sparse file support, but repositories created with sparse file support cannot be read by unpatched rdiff-backup. That's okay, but it might make most of us feel that we would rather not use this patch unless we specifically need it, until it is part of mainstream rdiff-backup.On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:11:00PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote:Feedback and comments are appreciated!----Original Message----- From: Matthew Miller>How will this interact with existing backups?rdiff-backup re-writes changed destination files, so if a source file changes, rdiff-backup will write the whole file after calculating a reverse-diff for the increment tree. Existing backup trees will become sparse over time, as files change. -Eric
Sadly, development of rdiff-backup has gone silent for a while now. I think these patches are great (as were Daniel Miller's a while ago, which provided a --verify-full option) but no one from the development side seems to be updating the code at the moment. (I would love to be proved wrong.)
- Dominic
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |