|
From: | Joe Steele |
Subject: | Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Question about --verify |
Date: | Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:44:11 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
After seeing your post, it occurred to me that your problem might be related to a bug report I filed back in June (and which I have just now updated):
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?26848As noted in the bug report, I suspect that files restored from your backups will likely end up being hardlinked differently from the way that they were linked originally.
I had included a patch with the bug report that seemed to fix the problems I reported. That is to say, future backups could be made and restored correctly, hardlinks and all. However, the patch won't help with the restoration of earlier backups from a repository.
Although I use this patch myself, I would feel a lot better if the patch was reviewed and blessed by the developers before it went into widespread use for anything other than testing purposes. My dabbling with the internals of the rdiff-backup program has been very limited.
--Joe On 11/25/2009 4:11 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
Hi After following the thread on verify times. I have decided to run --verify on some of my backup reposand I am getting a lot ofWarning: Cannot find SHA1 digest for file bin/bzcat, perhaps because this feature was added in v1.1.1 Warning: Cannot find SHA1 digest for file bin/bzip2, perhaps because this feature was added in v1.1.1 this is against a repo that i just recently ran rdiff-backup against with no errors. this is on debian amd64 ii rdiff-backup 1.2.8-5 remote incremental backup which looks like the latest version
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |