[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Unclear part in the --remove-older-then section
From: |
Chris Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Unclear part in the --remove-older-then section of man rdiff-backup |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:15:40 +0100 (BST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23) |
Hi Cybertinus,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Cybertinus wrote:
I'm reading the manual page of rdiff-backup and I don't understand the
following part of the manual. It is the last paragraph of the option
--remove-older-then:
"Note that snapshots of deleted files are covered by this operation.
Thus if you deleted a file two weeks ago, backed up immediately
afterwards, and then ran rdiff-backup with --remove-older-than 10D
today, no trace of that file would remain. Finally, file selection
options such as --include and --exclude don't affect
--remove-older-than."
Does this mean that when I delete a file by accident but I've run a
rdiff-backup --remove-older-than in the mean time I can't get it back
from my backup? Not even from a snapshot that was created before I
deleted that file (but to new to be deleted by --remove-older-then)?
My reading of your quotation from the manual describes the behaviour that
you and I both expect, and not the bad behaviour that you describe above.
The sentence in question is:
"If you deleted a file two weeks ago, backed up immediately afterwards,
and then ran rdiff-backup with --remove-older-than 10D today, no trace of
that file would remain."
I think this sentence counts as explanatory rather than as a definition of
behaviour, so arguably it is superfluous. It seems clear enough to me, but
if it's confusing to anyone then I think it ought to be rewritten to
improve it. Perhaps this version would be easier to understand:
"The --remove-older-than option will delete all snapshots older than the
specified date, including all changes and deleted files contained in them.
If a file was deleted or corrupted before one of those snapshots was made,
it will no longer be recoverable."
Does that help you? Does anyone else think it is an improvement, or wish
to suggest a better version?
Cheers, Chris.
--
_____ __ _
\ __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson <address@hidden> Cambs UK |
/ (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Ruby/Perl/SQL Developer |
\__/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU : free your mind & your software |