|
From: | Matthew A. Thompson, Contractor, Code 6189 |
Subject: | Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Errors between rdiff-backup and NTFS-3G 2009.2.1? |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:18:03 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486426I tried "--no-eas", with no go, but mounting NTFS-3G 2009.2.1 with default options (whatever that is) *and* using "--no-acls" does work.
So, a question: which is better? Should I mount my drive using "streams_interface=none" and then run rdiff-backup as usual OR mount with default and use rdiff-backup --no-acls? Are these options equivalent, or does one neglect information the other doesn't?
Also, for whom is this a "bug" (if a bug at all)? NTFS-3G or rdiff-backup...or something else entirely?
Thanks, Matt Thompson -- Dr Matthew Thompson, NRC Postdoc (Contractor) Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6189 202-767-2160
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |