[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] windows profiles and refreshed files
From: |
Ben Escoto |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] windows profiles and refreshed files |
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2004 16:50:17 -0700 |
>>>>> "Patrick J. Walsh" <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote the following on Sun, 02 May 2004 15:48:55 -0400
> We use roaming profiles for our windows users so that they can log in
> from different machines and see their familiar list of recent files, desktop
> settings, etc. Every time a user logs on, their profile is copied to the
> local machine. When they log off, it gets copied back. Typically, very
> little has changed. But of course the time stamps are updated.
>
> My question is this: would there be any benefit to using the
> --no-compare-inode option? Would this decrease the number and size of files
> generated? Is there any penalty such as a speed decrease when using this
> option?
>
> Or -- is there a way to tell rdiff to ignore changed file times if the
> file is unchanged?
>
> And finally -- does backing up a dir structure that has updated
> modification times unnecessarily tax the server? Should I then maybe
> exclude these directories during the hourly updates and just back them up
> once a day?
The --no-compare-inode option doesn't do what you hoped. There's no
option option to tell rdiff-backup to ignore files with changed times
if they are unchanged: rdiff-backup can only tell whether a file
with a changed time is changed by reading the file.
If a file's data doesn't change, the diffs produced will be very
small, and not take up much bandwidth. But reading the files and
producing/checking their signatures will take extra time.
--
Ben Escoto
pgpisg0oeSrab.pgp
Description: PGP signature