Re: [Rapp-dev] Padding for binary morphing: (SIZE + 1) / 2 or SIZE / 2?

[Johan Almbladh]

No, if it is not already allowed I think we should keep the padding requirements as they are today. It is always possible to relax the constraints later, but not the other way around.

/Johan

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <address@hidden> wrote:

> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:29:15 +0100
> From: Johan Almbladh <address@hidden>

> Also note that x and y padding sizes can be different if the SE is
> asymmetric (3x7, 2x1), i.e. SIZE is width or height of the SE.

Do you mean we should *allow* different padding sizes in width
and height for those cases?

brgds, H-P