[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] [patch 2/8]
From: |
Andreas Gruenbacher |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] [patch 2/8] |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:56:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8 |
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:58, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andreas, all,
>
> [Andreas Gruenbacher]
>
> > The patch doesn't really fix anything: stderr is not connected to a pipe
> > here.
>
> Gery's patch is not preventing the SIGPIPE from happening, it's only
> redirecting the "broken pipe" error message to /dev/null. I think it
> does indeed work.
Ah ... right, sorry.
the results I get when adding SIGPIPE handlers into the picture are even more
interesting.
There seems to be a workaround using Process Substitution (which we recently
discussed). This construct seems to work (always?):
while ...; do
...
done < <(...)
This would badly mess up the code though.
-- Andreas.
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), (continued)
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/14
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), John Vandenberg, 2005/09/14
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), Andreas Gruenbacher, 2005/09/14
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), Jean Delvare, 2005/09/14
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/14
- Re: [Quilt-dev] workaround "received broken pipe signal" bash bug (was [patch 2/8]), Jean Delvare, 2005/09/14
Re: [Quilt-dev] [patch 2/8], Jean Delvare, 2005/09/14
Re: [Quilt-dev] [patch 2/8], Peter Williams, 2005/09/14
Re: [Quilt-dev] [patch 2/8], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/15
[Quilt-dev] [patch 7/8], gary, 2005/09/13