[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: [Quilt-cvs] quilt ./quilt.changes quilt/push.in scr
From: |
Martin Quinson |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: [Quilt-cvs] quilt ./quilt.changes quilt/push.in scripts/apa... |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:09:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 06:41:09PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Friday 11 April 2003 17:55, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:17:37AM -0400, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/quilt
> > > Module name: quilt
> > > Changes by: Andreas Gruenbacher <address@hidden> 03/04/11
> > > 11:17:37
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > . : quilt.changes
> > > quilt : push.in
> > > scripts : apatch.in
> > >
> > > Log message:
> > > - Apply patches with `patch -f' by default. Add --interactive
> > > option top `quilt push' to allow applying patches without
> > > `patch -f'.
> >
> > Are you sure? I like pretty much the fact that push and pop fails when
> > something goes wrong. It allows me to put push -a in makefiles and so.
>
> patch -f fails in the same way as patch without -f does, so quilt will still
> fail for patches that don't apply cleanly, as it does now. The difference is,
> patch -f does not ask the user questions. The questions might sometimes be
> helpful when applying a patch that does not apply cleanly by hand.
>
> Does this make sense?
Completely. In fact, I never experienced those questions and did not even
know that they exist. Now, I agree with you, this change is a good thing.
Sorry for the noise, Mt.