[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PULL 2/5] qemu-options: Tweak [, maxcpus=cpus] to [, maxcpus=maxcpus]
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
[PULL 2/5] qemu-options: Tweak [, maxcpus=cpus] to [, maxcpus=maxcpus] |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:30:52 +0200 |
From: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
In qemu-option.hx, there is "-smp [[cpus=]n][,maxcpus=cpus]..." in the
DEF part, and "-smp [[cpus=]n][,maxcpus=maxcpus]..." in the RST part.
Obviously the later is right, let's fix the previous one.
Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210928121134.21064-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
---
qemu-options.hx | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
index 4f2dc91e0b27..bba1ef973fec 100644
--- a/qemu-options.hx
+++ b/qemu-options.hx
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ SRST
ERST
DEF("smp", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_smp,
- "-smp
[[cpus=]n][,maxcpus=cpus][,sockets=sockets][,dies=dies][,cores=cores][,threads=threads]\n"
+ "-smp
[[cpus=]n][,maxcpus=maxcpus][,sockets=sockets][,dies=dies][,cores=cores][,threads=threads]\n"
" set the number of CPUs to 'n' [default=1]\n"
" maxcpus= maximum number of total CPUs, including\n"
" offline CPUs for hotplug, etc\n"
--
2.31.1
- [PULL 0/5] Trivial branch for 6.2 patches, Laurent Vivier, 2021/10/04
- [PULL 4/5] target/sh4: Use lookup_symbol in sh4_tr_disas_log, Laurent Vivier, 2021/10/04
- [PULL 1/5] qemu-options: -chardev reconnect=seconds duplicated in help, tidy up, Laurent Vivier, 2021/10/04
- [PULL 5/5] hw/remote/proxy: Categorize Wireless devices as 'Network' ones, Laurent Vivier, 2021/10/04
- [PULL 3/5] qemu-options: Add missing "sockets=2, maxcpus=2" to CLI "-smp 2", Laurent Vivier, 2021/10/04
- [PULL 2/5] qemu-options: Tweak [, maxcpus=cpus] to [, maxcpus=maxcpus],
Laurent Vivier <=
- Re: [PULL 0/5] Trivial branch for 6.2 patches, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/04