[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/scsi/lsi53c895a: Sanitize some trace events format
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/scsi/lsi53c895a: Sanitize some trace events format |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:08:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
Le 25/09/2020 à 22:12, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 15/09/20 19:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Make some lsi53c895a trace events more understandable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/scsi/trace-events | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/trace-events b/hw/scsi/trace-events
>> index 9a4a60ca635..ac4209f361e 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/trace-events
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/trace-events
>> @@ -234,9 +234,9 @@ spapr_vscsi_do_crq(unsigned c0, unsigned c1) "crq: %02x
>> %02x ..."
>>
>> # lsi53c895a.c
>> lsi_reset(void) "Reset"
>> -lsi_update_irq(int level, uint8_t dstat, uint8_t sist1, uint8_t sist0)
>> "Update IRQ level %d dstat 0x%02x sist 0x%02x0x%02x"
>> +lsi_update_irq(int level, uint8_t dstat, uint8_t sist1, uint8_t sist0)
>> "Update IRQ level %d dstat 0x%02x sist 1:0x%02x 0:0x%02x"
>> lsi_update_irq_disconnected(void) "Handled IRQs & disconnected, looking for
>> pending processes"
>> -lsi_script_scsi_interrupt(uint8_t stat1, uint8_t stat0, uint8_t sist1,
>> uint8_t sist0) "SCSI Interrupt 0x%02x0x%02x prev 0x%02x0x%02x"
>> +lsi_script_scsi_interrupt(uint8_t stat1, uint8_t stat0, uint8_t sist1,
>> uint8_t sist0) "SCSI Interrupt stat 1:0x%02x 0:0x%02x sist 1:0x%02x 0:0x%02x"
>> lsi_script_dma_interrupt(uint8_t stat, uint8_t dstat) "DMA Interrupt 0x%x
>> prev 0x%x"
>> lsi_bad_phase_jump(uint32_t dsp) "Data phase mismatch jump to 0x%"PRIX32
>> lsi_bad_phase_interrupt(void) "Phase mismatch interrupt"
>>
>
> The idea of the patch is that SIST0 and SIST1 are usually read in pairs.
> So it's a bit weird in the tracepoint format but it's actually more
> understandable this way when you see it printed.
>
> Laurent, can you please unqueue this?
No problem. Done.
Thanks,
Laurent