[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: remove a duplicated wo
From: |
Cao jin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: remove a duplicated word in comments |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:29:16 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 |
ping
On 11/11/2016 11:01 AM, Cao jin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 31aaecb..c94987c 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> * 0 is reserved for this since absence of capabilities is indicated by
> * 0 for the ID, version, AND next pointer. However,
> pcie_add_capability()
> * uses ID 0 as reserved for list management and will incorrectly match
> and
> - * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with with this
> - * ID. Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved
> in
> + * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with this ID.
> + * Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in
> * part for identifying absence of capabilities in a root complex
> register
> * block. If the ID still exists after adding capabilities, switch back
> to
> * zero. We'll mark this entire first dword as emulated for this
> purpose.
>
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: remove a duplicated word in comments,
Cao jin <=