qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Stable-7.2.15 02/33] target/ppc: Fix lxvx/stxvx facility check


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: [Stable-7.2.15 02/33] target/ppc: Fix lxvx/stxvx facility check
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 09:38:28 +0300

From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>

The XT check for the lxvx/stxvx instructions is currently
inverted. This was introduced during the move to decodetree.

>From the ISA:
  Chapter 7. Vector-Scalar Extension Facility
  Load VSX Vector Indexed X-form

  lxvx XT,RA,RB
  if TX=0 & MSR.VSX=0 then VSX_Unavailable()
  if TX=1 & MSR.VEC=0 then Vector_Unavailable()
  ...
  Let XT be the value 32×TX + T.

The code currently does the opposite:

    if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
        REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
    } else {
        REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);
    }

This was already fixed for lxv/stxv at commit "2cc0e449d1 (target/ppc:
Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check)", but the indexed forms were missed.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 70426b5bb7 ("target/ppc: moved stxvx and lxvx from legacy to decodtree")
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240911141651.6914-1-farosas@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8bded2e73e80823a67f730140788a3c5e60bf4b5)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc 
b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
index de1709809d..9e10291010 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
+++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
@@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ static bool do_lstxv_PLS_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_PLS_D 
*a,
 
 static bool do_lstxv_X(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a, bool store, bool paired)
 {
-    if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
+    if (paired || a->rt < 32) {
         REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
     } else {
         REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);
-- 
2.39.5




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]