qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-user/ppc: Fix sigmask endianness issue in sigretur


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-user/ppc: Fix sigmask endianness issue in sigreturn
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:53:25 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

17.10.2024 15:54, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
do_setcontext() copies the target sigmask without endianness handling
and then uses target_to_host_sigset_internal(), which expects a
byte-swapped one. Use target_to_host_sigset() instead.

Fixes: bcd4933a23f1 ("linux-user: ppc signal handling")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
  linux-user/ppc/signal.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/ppc/signal.c b/linux-user/ppc/signal.c
index a1d8c0bccc1..24e5a02a782 100644
--- a/linux-user/ppc/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/ppc/signal.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static int do_setcontext(struct target_ucontext *ucp, 
CPUPPCState *env, int sig)
      if (!lock_user_struct(VERIFY_READ, mcp, mcp_addr, 1))
          return 1;
- target_to_host_sigset_internal(&blocked, &set);
+    target_to_host_sigset(&blocked, &set);
      set_sigmask(&blocked);
      restore_user_regs(env, mcp, sig);

Shouldn't this change be picked for all stable releases too?
Yes, the issue is very old so probably does not have big impact,
but it looks like it should be okay to fix it finally?

I'm picking it up, please let me know if I shouldn't.

Thanks,

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]