Hi Chuang.
Look fine for me, and only some minor nits:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 04:13:44PM +0800, Chuang Xu wrote:
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:13:44 +0800
From: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical
processors in the physical package
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
When QEMU is started with:
-cpu host,migratable=on,host-cache-info=on,l3-cache=off
-smp 180,sockets=2,dies=1,cores=45,threads=2
Try to execute "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in guest, we'll obtain a value of 90 for
CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], while the expected value is 128. And Try to
execute "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in guest, we'll obtain a value of 63 for
CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26] as expected.
I polished the sentences a bit:
When executing "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in the guest, we obtain a value of 90 for
CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], whereas the expected value is 128. Additionally,
executing "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in the guest yields a value of 63 for
CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26], which matches the expected result.
As (1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) round up to the nearest power-of-2 integer,
s/round/rounds/
we'd beter round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2
integer too. Otherwise we may encounter unexpected results in guest.
For example, when QEMU is started with CLI above and xtopology is disabled,
What's xtopology?
guest kernel 5.15.120 uses CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16]/(1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) to
calculate threads-per-core in detect_ht(). Then guest will get "90/(1+63)=1"
as the result, even though theads-per-core should actually be 2.
s/theads-per-core/threads-per-core/
So let us round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2 integer
to solve the unexpected result.
In addition, we introduce max_thread_number_in_package() instead of
using pow2ceil() to be compatible with smp and hybrid.
Signed-off-by: Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 85ef7452c0..1b4e3b6931 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -261,6 +261,12 @@ static uint32_t max_thread_ids_for_cache(X86CPUTopoInfo
*topo_info,
return num_ids - 1;
}
+static uint32_t max_thread_number_in_package(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
+{
+ uint32_t num_threads = 1 << apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info);
+ return num_threads;
+}
+
static uint32_t max_core_ids_in_package(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
{
uint32_t num_cores = 1 << (apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info) -
@@ -6462,7 +6468,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index,
uint32_t count,
}
*edx = env->features[FEAT_1_EDX];
if (threads_per_pkg > 1) {
- *ebx |= threads_per_pkg << 16;
+ *ebx |= max_thread_number_in_package(&topo_info) << 16;
This helper has only 1 caller and its name doesn't distinguish the
addressable ID, so it's not necessary. I feel it's better to shift
the bits directly here:
*ebx |= 1 << apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info) << 16;
*edx |= CPUID_HT;
}
if (!cpu->enable_pmu) {
--
2.20.1
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>