qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxvx/stxvx facility check


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxvx/stxvx facility check
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 06:56:06 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 9/20/24 11:24, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Thu, 2024-09-19 at 13:36 +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
ping, adding Richard.

We will need to include this downstream because of the breakage its
lack causes.
It is already reviewed by me, but some TCG maintainer indicating it
will be included in some queue would help,

Thanks,

Claudio

On 9/18/24 17:11, Claudio Fontana wrote:
Adding Ilya FYI.

Ciao,

Claudio

On 9/11/24 18:19, Claudio Fontana wrote:
On 9/11/24 16:16, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
The XT check for the lxvx/stxvx instructions is currently
inverted. This was introduced during the move to decodetree.

 From the ISA:
   Chapter 7. Vector-Scalar Extension Facility
   Load VSX Vector Indexed X-form

   lxvx XT,RA,RB
   if TX=0 & MSR.VSX=0 then VSX_Unavailable()
   if TX=1 & MSR.VEC=0 then Vector_Unavailable()
   ...
   Let XT be the value 32×TX + T.

The code currently does the opposite:

     if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
         REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
     } else {
         REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);
     }

This was already fixed for lxv/stxv at commit "2cc0e449d1
(target/ppc:
Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check)", but the indexed forms were
missed.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 70426b5bb7 ("target/ppc: moved stxvx and lxvx from
legacy to decodtree")
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
---
  target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
index 40a87ddc4a..a869f30e86 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
+++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
@@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static bool do_lstxv_PLS_D(DisasContext
*ctx, arg_PLS_D *a,
 static bool do_lstxv_X(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a, bool
store, bool paired)
  {
-    if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
+    if (paired || a->rt < 32) {
          REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
      } else {
          REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);

Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>

FWIW

Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

But I'm not a maintainer, I guess Richard will need to pick it up.

Queued, thanks.

r~




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]