qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] vdpa: Increase out buffer size for CVQ commands


From: Eugenio Perez Martin
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa: Increase out buffer size for CVQ commands
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:08:09 +0200

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:26 AM Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023/6/25 18:48, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 3:07 AM Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> According to the VirtIO standard, "Since there are no guarantees,
> >> it can use a hash filter or silently switch to
> >> allmulti or promiscuous mode if it is given too many addresses."
> >> To achive this, QEMU ignores MAC addresses and marks `mac_table.x_overflow`
> >> in the device internal state in virtio_net_handle_mac()
> >> if the guest sets more than `MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES` MAC addresses
> >> for the filter table.
> >>
> >> However, the problem is that QEMU never marks the `mac_table.x_overflow`
> >> for the vdpa device internal state when the guest sets more than
> >> `MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES` MAC addresses.
> >>
> >> To be more specific, currently QEMU offers a buffer size of
> >> vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_len() for CVQ commands, which represents the size of
> >> VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_TABLE_SET command with a maximum `MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES`
> >> MAC addresses.
> >>
> >> Consequently, if the guest sets more than `MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES` MAC 
> >> addresses,
> >> QEMU truncates the CVQ command data and copies this incomplete command
> >> into the out buffer. In this situation, virtio_net_handle_mac() fails the
> >> integrity check and returns VIRTIO_NET_ERR instead of marking
> >> `mac_table.x_overflow` and returning VIRTIO_NET_OK, since the copied
> >> CVQ command in the buffer is incomplete and flawed.
> >>
> >> This patch solves this problem by increasing the buffer size to
> >> vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len(), which represents the size of the buffer
> >> that is allocated and mmaped. Therefore, everything should work correctly
> >> as long as the guest sets fewer than `(vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len() -
> >> sizeof(struct virtio_net_ctrl_hdr)
> >> - 2 * sizeof(struct virtio_net_ctrl_mac)) / ETH_ALEN` MAC addresses.
> >>
> >> Considering the highly unlikely scenario for the guest setting more than
> >> that number of MAC addresses for the filter table, this patch should
> >> work fine for the majority of cases. If there is a need for more than thoes
> >> entries, we can increase the value for vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len()
> >> in the future, mapping more than one page for command output.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 7a7f87e94c ("vdpa: Move command buffers map to start of net device")
> >> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>   net/vhost-vdpa.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> index 5a72204899..ecfa8852b5 100644
> >> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> @@ -784,9 +784,18 @@ static int 
> >> vhost_vdpa_net_handle_ctrl_avail(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> >>       };
> >>       ssize_t dev_written = -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * This code truncates the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_TABLE_SET CVQ command
> >> +     * and prevents QEMU from marking `mac_table.x_overflow` in the device
> >> +     * internal state in virtio_net_handle_mac() if the guest sets more 
> >> than
> >> +     * `(vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len() - sizeof(struct 
> >> virtio_net_ctrl_hdr)
> >> +     * - 2 * sizeof(struct virtio_net_ctrl_mac)) / ETH_ALEN` MAC 
> >> addresses for
> >> +     * filter table.
> >> +     * However, this situation is considered rare, so it is acceptable.
> >
> > I think we can also fix this situation. If it fits in one page, we can
> > still send the same page to the device and virtio_net_handle_ctrl_iov.
> > If it does not fit in one page, we can clear all mac filters with
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RX_ALLUNI and / or VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RX_ALLMULTI.
>
> Hi Eugenio,
>
> Thank you for your review.
>
> However, it appears that the approach may not resolve the situation.
>
> When the CVQ command exceeds one page,
> vhost_vdpa_net_handle_ctrl_avail() truncates the command, resulting in a
> malformed SVQ command being received by the hardware, which in turn
> triggers an error acknowledgement to QEMU.
>

If that happens we can sanitize the copied cmd buffer. Let's start
with an overflowed unicast table first.

To configure the device we need to transform the command to
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RX_ALLUNI, as we cannot copy all the table to the out
cmd page. If that succeeds, we can continue to register that in the
VirtIONet struct.

 We can copy the first MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES + 1 entries and set entries =
(MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES + 1), and then use that buffer to call
virtio_net_handle_ctrl_iov. That sets VirtIONet.uni_overflow = true
and VirtIONet.all_uni = false.

We need to handle the multicast addresses in a similar way, but we can
find cases where only multicast addresses overflow.

In future series we can improve the situation:
* Allocating bigger out buffers so more mac addresses fit in it.
* Mapping also guest pages in CVQ, so the real device is able to read
the full table but VirtIONet only stores the first MAC_TABLE_ENTRIES
or .uni_overflow = 1.

But I think it should be enough at this point.

Thanks!

> So if CVQ command exceeds one page, vhost_vdpa_net_handle_ctrl_avail()
> should not update the device internal state because the SVQ command
> fails.(Please correct me if I am wrong)
>
> It appears that my commit message and comments did not take this into
> account. I will refactor them in the v2 patch..
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >> +     */
> >>       out.iov_len = iov_to_buf(elem->out_sg, elem->out_num, 0,
> >>                                s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer,
> >> -                             vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_len());
> >> +                             vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len());
> >>       if (*(uint8_t *)s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer == VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE) {
> >>           /*
> >>            * Guest announce capability is emulated by qemu, so don't 
> >> forward to
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]