[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] dp8393x: Don't reset Silicon Revision register
From: |
Finn Thain |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] dp8393x: Don't reset Silicon Revision register |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:28:34 +1100 (AEDT) |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daud? wrote:
> On 1/19/20 11:59 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > The jazzsonic driver in Linux uses the Silicon Revision register value
> > to probe the chip. The driver fails unless the SR register contains 4.
> > Unfortunately, reading this register in QEMU usually returns 0 because
> > the s->regs[] array gets wiped after a software reset.
> >
> > Fixes: bd8f1ebce4 ("net/dp8393x: fix hardware reset")
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/net/dp8393x.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/net/dp8393x.c b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > index 1b73a8703b..71af0fad51 100644
> > --- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > @@ -591,6 +591,10 @@ static uint64_t dp8393x_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> > unsigned int size)
> > val |= s->cam[s->regs[SONIC_CEP] & 0xf][2* (SONIC_CAP0 -
> > reg)];
> > }
> > break;
> > + /* Read-only */
> > + case SONIC_SR:
> > + val = 4; /* only revision recognized by Linux/mips */
> > + break;
> > /* All other registers have no special contrainst */
> > default:
> > val = s->regs[reg];
> > @@ -971,7 +975,6 @@ static void dp8393x_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> > **errp)
> > qemu_format_nic_info_str(qemu_get_queue(s->nic), s->conf.macaddr.a);
> > s->watchdog = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, dp8393x_watchdog, s);
> > - s->regs[SONIC_SR] = 0x0004; /* only revision recognized by Linux */
> > memory_region_init_ram(&s->prom, OBJECT(dev),
> > "dp8393x-prom", SONIC_PROM_SIZE, &local_err);
> >
>
> Please fix in dp8393x_reset() instead:
>
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/hw/net/dp8393x.c b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> index cdc2631c0c..65eb9c23a7 100644
> --- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> +++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> @@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ static void dp8393x_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> timer_del(s->watchdog);
>
> memset(s->regs, 0, sizeof(s->regs));
> + s->regs[SONIC_SR] = 0x0004; /* only revision recognized by Linux */
> s->regs[SONIC_CR] = SONIC_CR_RST | SONIC_CR_STP | SONIC_CR_RXDIS;
> s->regs[SONIC_DCR] &= ~(SONIC_DCR_EXBUS | SONIC_DCR_LBR);
> s->regs[SONIC_RCR] &= ~(SONIC_RCR_LB0 | SONIC_RCR_LB1 | SONIC_RCR_BRD |
> SONIC_RCR_RNT);
> @@ -914,7 +915,6 @@ static void dp8393x_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> qemu_format_nic_info_str(qemu_get_queue(s->nic), s->conf.macaddr.a);
>
> s->watchdog = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, dp8393x_watchdog, s);
> - s->regs[SONIC_SR] = 0x0004; /* only revision recognized by Linux */
>
> memory_region_init_ram(&s->prom, OBJECT(dev),
> "dp8393x-prom", SONIC_PROM_SIZE, &local_err);
> ---
>
This would allow the host to change the value of the Silicon Revision
register. However, the datasheet says,
4.3.13 Silicon Revision Register
This is a 16-bit read only register. It contains information on the
current revision of the SONIC. The value of the DP83932CVF revision
register is 6h.
I haven't actually tried storing a different value in this register on
National Semiconductor hardware, but I'm willing to do that test if you
wish.
- [PATCH v3 08/14] dp8393x: Don't clobber packet checksum, (continued)
- [PATCH v3 08/14] dp8393x: Don't clobber packet checksum, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
- [PATCH v3 05/14] dp8393x: Update LLFA and CRDA registers from rx descriptor, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
- [PATCH v3 09/14] dp8393x: Use long-word-aligned RRA pointers in 32-bit mode, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
- [PATCH v3 10/14] dp8393x: Pad frames to word or long word boundary, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
- [PATCH v3 03/14] dp8393x: Clean up endianness hacks, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
- [PATCH v3 13/14] dp8393x: Don't reset Silicon Revision register, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
[PATCH v3 12/14] dp8393x: Always update RRA pointers and sequence numbers, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
[PATCH v3 14/14] dp8393x: Don't stop reception upon RBE interrupt assertion, Finn Thain, 2020/01/19
Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation, Laurent Vivier, 2020/01/27
Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation, Finn Thain, 2020/01/27