Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v5 3/3] qemu-iotests: Add test for bz #1745922

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

13.09.2019 19:39, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 16:27 +0000, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 13.09.2019 18:28, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>    tests/qemu-iotests/263     | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    tests/qemu-iotests/263.out | 40 +++++++++++++++++
>>>    tests/qemu-iotests/group   |  2 +
>>>    3 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>>>    create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/263
>>>    create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/263.out
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/263 b/tests/qemu-iotests/263
>>> new file mode 100755
>>> index 0000000000..d2c030fae9
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/263
>>
>> [..]
>>
>>> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/group
>>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/group
>>> @@ -274,5 +274,7 @@
>>>    257 rw
>>>    258 rw quick
>>>    262 rw quick migration
>>> +263 rw quick
>>>    265 rw auto quick
>>>    266 rw quick
>>> +>>>>>>> patched
>>>
>>
>> last line is a mistake.
> Last minute merge mistake :-(
> 
>>
>> also, test failed for me:
>>
>> 263      fail       [19:21:35] [19:21:35]                    output mismatch 
>> (see 263.out.bad)
>> --- /work/src/qemu/maxim-luks/tests/qemu-iotests/263.out        2019-09-13 
>> 19:11:45.464727427 +0300
>> +++ /work/src/qemu/maxim-luks/tests/qemu-iotests/263.out.bad    2019-09-13 
>> 19:21:35.535381253 +0300
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>>
>>    testing LUKS qcow2 encryption
>>
>> +qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT: No crypto library supporting PBKDF in this 
>> build: Function not implemented
>>    Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=1048576 
>> encrypt.format=luks encrypt.key-secret=sec0 encrypt.iter-time=10
>>    == reading the whole image ==
>>    read 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
>> Failures: 263
>> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>>
>>
>> and if reconfigure with
>>    --enable-gnutls --enable-gcrypt --enable-vhost-crypto 
>> --enable-crypto-afalg
>> (don't know which one is actually needed)
>> it works..
>>
>> so, we at least should skip the test if it's unsupported
> Don't know. I based this test on 188 and it also doesn't have anything 
> special about this.
> Its not in auto group though.
> I guess we need to ask Daniel about this.
> 
> 

Hmm, the problem was not in "configure" arguments, seems needed thing is 
enabled by default, but actually
all works for me after installing gnutls-devel

and without it 188 don't work without it (or some its dependencies) too. So 
it's "not a regression"
and I'dont care:

Tested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
   [don't forget to drop ">>>>>>> patched"]

and I also checked that test fails if position it before patch 01, so it's true 
bug-catcher.

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir