[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-stable] [PULL 02/12] i386/acpi: fix gint overflow in crs_range_com
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-stable] [PULL 02/12] i386/acpi: fix gint overflow in crs_range_compare |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:31:33 -0400 |
From: Evgeny Yakovlev <address@hidden>
When very large regions (32GB sized in our case, PCI pass-through of GPUs)
are compared substraction result does not fit into gint.
As a result crs_replace_with_free_ranges does not get sorted ranges and
incorrectly computes PCI64 free space regions. Which then makes linux
guest complain about device and PCI64 hole intersection and device
becomes unusable.
Fix that by returning exactly fitting ranges.
Also fix indentation of an entire crs_replace_with_free_ranges to make
checkpatch happy.
Cc: address@hidden
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Yakovlev <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Yakovlev <address@hidden>
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index d281ffa89e..e7b756b51b 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -755,10 +755,16 @@ static void crs_range_set_free(CrsRangeSet *range_set)
static gint crs_range_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
{
- CrsRangeEntry *entry_a = *(CrsRangeEntry **)a;
- CrsRangeEntry *entry_b = *(CrsRangeEntry **)b;
+ CrsRangeEntry *entry_a = *(CrsRangeEntry **)a;
+ CrsRangeEntry *entry_b = *(CrsRangeEntry **)b;
- return (int64_t)entry_a->base - (int64_t)entry_b->base;
+ if (entry_a->base < entry_b->base) {
+ return -1;
+ } else if (entry_a->base > entry_b->base) {
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ return 0;
+ }
}
/*
--
MST
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qemu-stable] [PULL 02/12] i386/acpi: fix gint overflow in crs_range_compare,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=