[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] spapr_pci: Fix interrupt leak in rt
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] spapr_pci: Fix interrupt leak in rtas_ibm_change_msi() error path |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:15:03 +0100 |
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:06:47 +1100
David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 06:28:37PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Now that IRQ allocation has been split in two (first allocate IRQ numbers,
> > then claim them), if the claiming fails, we must release the IRQs.
> >
> > Fixes: 4fe75a8ccd80 "spapr: split the IRQ allocation sequence"
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
>
> Applied to ppc-for-4.0, thanks.
>
Oops I've just realized there's an off-by-one error...
> > ---
> > hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> > index 41d81f4a8500..6fe3c10c8d4c 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> > @@ -393,6 +393,12 @@ static void rtas_ibm_change_msi(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > for (i = 0; i < req_num; i++) {
> > spapr_irq_claim(spapr, irq + i, false, &err);
> > if (err) {
> > + if (i) {
> > + spapr_irq_free(spapr, irq, i + 1);
... here. It should actually be:
+ spapr_irq_free(spapr, irq, i);
Can you fix this in your tree or should I post a v2 ?
> > + }
> > + if (!smc->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> > + spapr_irq_msi_free(spapr, irq, req_num);
> > + }
> > error_reportf_err(err, "Can't allocate MSIs for device %x: ",
> > config_addr);
> > rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR);
> >
>
pgpO0VOfnxlY_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature