[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] mirror: fix dead-lock
From: |
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy |
Subject: |
[Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] mirror: fix dead-lock |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:18:00 +0300 |
Let start from the beginning:
Commit b9e413dd375 (in 2.9)
"block: explicitly acquire aiocontext in aio callbacks that need it"
added pairs of aio_context_acquire/release to mirror_write_complete and
mirror_read_complete, when they were aio callbacks for blk_aio_* calls.
Then, commit 2e1990b26e5 (in 3.0) "block/mirror: Convert to coroutines"
dropped these blk_aio_* calls, than mirror_write_complete and
mirror_read_complete are not callbacks more, and don't need additional
aiocontext acquiring. Furthermore, mirror_read_complete calls
blk_co_pwritev inside these pair of aio_context_acquire/release, which
leads to the following dead-lock with mirror:
(gdb) info thr
Id Target Id Frame
3 Thread (LWP 145412) "qemu-system-x86" syscall ()
2 Thread (LWP 145416) "qemu-system-x86" __lll_lock_wait ()
* 1 Thread (LWP 145411) "qemu-system-x86" __lll_lock_wait ()
(gdb) bt
#0 __lll_lock_wait ()
#1 _L_lock_812 ()
#2 __GI___pthread_mutex_lock
#3 qemu_mutex_lock_impl (mutex=0x561032dce420 <qemu_global_mutex>,
file=0x5610327d8654 "util/main-loop.c", line=236) at
util/qemu-thread-posix.c:66
#4 qemu_mutex_lock_iothread_impl
#5 os_host_main_loop_wait (timeout=480116000) at util/main-loop.c:236
#6 main_loop_wait (nonblocking=0) at util/main-loop.c:497
#7 main_loop () at vl.c:1892
#8 main
Printing contents of qemu_global_mutex, I see that "__owner = 145416",
so, thr1 is main loop, and now it wants BQL, which is owned by thr2.
(gdb) thr 2
(gdb) bt
#0 __lll_lock_wait ()
#1 _L_lock_870 ()
#2 __GI___pthread_mutex_lock
#3 qemu_mutex_lock_impl (mutex=0x561034d25dc0, ...
#4 aio_context_acquire (ctx=0x561034d25d60)
#5 dma_blk_cb
#6 dma_blk_io
#7 dma_blk_read
#8 ide_dma_cb
#9 bmdma_cmd_writeb
#10 bmdma_write
#11 memory_region_write_accessor
#12 access_with_adjusted_size
#15 flatview_write
#16 address_space_write
#17 address_space_rw
#18 kvm_handle_io
#19 kvm_cpu_exec
#20 qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn
#21 qemu_thread_start
#22 start_thread
#23 clone ()
Printing mutex in fr 2, I see "__owner = 145411", so thr2 wants aio
context mutex, which is owned by thr1. Classic dead-lock.
Then, let's check that aio context is hold by mirror coroutine: just
print coroutine stack of first tracked request in mirror job target:
(gdb) [...]
(gdb) qemu coroutine 0x561035dd0860
#0 qemu_coroutine_switch
#1 qemu_coroutine_yield
#2 qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath
#3 qemu_co_mutex_lock
#4 qcow2_co_pwritev
#5 bdrv_driver_pwritev
#6 bdrv_aligned_pwritev
#7 bdrv_co_pwritev
#8 blk_co_pwritev
#9 mirror_read_complete () at block/mirror.c:232
#10 mirror_co_read () at block/mirror.c:370
#11 coroutine_trampoline
#12 __start_context
Yes it is mirror_read_complete calling blk_co_pwritev after acquiring
aio context.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
block/mirror.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
index 56d9ef7474..8f52c6215d 100644
--- a/block/mirror.c
+++ b/block/mirror.c
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ static void coroutine_fn mirror_write_complete(MirrorOp
*op, int ret)
{
MirrorBlockJob *s = op->s;
- aio_context_acquire(blk_get_aio_context(s->common.blk));
if (ret < 0) {
BlockErrorAction action;
@@ -209,15 +208,14 @@ static void coroutine_fn mirror_write_complete(MirrorOp
*op, int ret)
s->ret = ret;
}
}
+
mirror_iteration_done(op, ret);
- aio_context_release(blk_get_aio_context(s->common.blk));
}
static void coroutine_fn mirror_read_complete(MirrorOp *op, int ret)
{
MirrorBlockJob *s = op->s;
- aio_context_acquire(blk_get_aio_context(s->common.blk));
if (ret < 0) {
BlockErrorAction action;
@@ -228,12 +226,11 @@ static void coroutine_fn mirror_read_complete(MirrorOp
*op, int ret)
}
mirror_iteration_done(op, ret);
- } else {
- ret = blk_co_pwritev(s->target, op->offset,
- op->qiov.size, &op->qiov, 0);
- mirror_write_complete(op, ret);
+ return;
}
- aio_context_release(blk_get_aio_context(s->common.blk));
+
+ ret = blk_co_pwritev(s->target, op->offset, op->qiov.size, &op->qiov, 0);
+ mirror_write_complete(op, ret);
}
/* Clip bytes relative to offset to not exceed end-of-file */
--
2.18.0
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Max Reitz, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Kevin Wolf, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Max Reitz, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Max Reitz, 2018/11/30
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2018/11/30
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image, Max Reitz, 2018/11/30
[Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] mirror: fix dead-lock,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <=
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel for-3.1?] [PATCH v2 0/2] mirror dead-lock, Eric Blake, 2018/11/29