[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/xtensa: drop num_[core_]re
From: |
Max Filippov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/xtensa: drop num_[core_]regs from dc232b/dc233c configs |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Nov 2018 18:17:31 -0800 |
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:53 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:02 AM Richard Henderson
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/31/18 9:35 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > gdb_regmap::num_core_regs field is initialized incorrectly in the dc232b
> > > and dc233c configurations. As a result the following message is
> > > displayed when attaching to an xtensa linux-user process:
> > >
> > > "Register 105 is not available",
> > >
> > > and gdb is unable to control the inferior.
> > >
> > > Now that xtensa_count_regs does the right thing, remove manual
> > > initialization of these fields from the affected configurations and let
> > > xtensa_finalize_config initialize them.
> > >
> > > Cc: address@hidden
> > > Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > target/xtensa/core-dc232b.c | 2 --
> > > target/xtensa/core-dc233c.c | 2 --
> > > 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>
> Can we include this patch for the 3.2 release?
I've found that this version is wrong (register lists are not
terminated for these
two cores), so I sent v2. After that I've found that it's still wrong,
i.e. the register
105 is still not available with v2. I dug a bit deeper and it looks
like register
handling should probably be the same for both system and linux-user cases.
I'll post v3 after some more testing in a few days.
--
Thanks.
-- Max