Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000e: Fix a bug where guest hangs upon migration

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 18/05/2017 12:04, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Sameeh Jubran (address@hidden) wrote:
>> The bug was caused by the "receive overrun" (bit #6 of the ICR register) 
>> interrupt
>> which would be triggered post migration in a heavy traffic environment. Even 
>> though the
>> "receive overrun" bit (#6) is masked out by the IMS register (refer to the 
>> log below)
>> the driver still receives an interrupt as the "receive overrun" bit (#6) 
>> causes the
>> "Other" - bit #24 of the ICR register - bit to be set as documented below. 
>> The driver
>> handles the interrupt and clears the "Other" bit (#24) but doesn't clear the
>> "receive overrun" bit (#6) which leads to an infinite loop. Apparently the 
>> Windows
>> driver expects that the "receive overrun" bit and other ones - documented 
>> below - to be
>> cleared when the "Other" bit (#24) is cleared.
>>
>> So to sum that up:
>> 1. Bit #6 of the ICR register is set by heavy traffic
>> 2. As a results of setting bit #6, bit #24 is set
>> 3. The driver receives an interrupt for bit 24 (it doesn't receieve an 
>> interrupt for bit #6 as it is masked out by IMS)
>> 4. The driver handles and clears the interrupt of bit #24
>> 5. Bit #6 is still set.
>> 6. 2 happens all over again
>>
>> The Interrupt Cause Read - ICR register:
>>
>> The ICR has the "Other" bit - bit #24 - that is set when one or more of the 
>> following
>> ICR register's bits are set:
>>
>> LSC - bit #2, RXO - bit #6, MDAC - bit #9, SRPD - bit #16, ACK - bit #17, 
>> MNG - bit #18
>>
>> Log sample of the storm:
>>
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x1000000 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0x1a00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x0 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0xa00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x0 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0xa00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x0 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0xa00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x0 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0xa00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x0 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0xa00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x0 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0xa00004)
>> address@hidden:e1000e_irq_pending_interrupts ICR PENDING: 0x1000000 (ICR: 
>> 0x815000c2, IMS: 0x1a00004)
>>
>> This commit solves:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447935
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449490
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sameeh Jubran <address@hidden>
> 
> Thanks, I tested this with our downstream and it does
> fix the reproducer for 1447935 for me, so:
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> 
> Dave
> 
>> ---
>>  hw/net/e1000e_core.c | 7 +++++--
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/net/e1000e_core.c b/hw/net/e1000e_core.c
>> index 28c5be1..8174b53 100644
>> --- a/hw/net/e1000e_core.c
>> +++ b/hw/net/e1000e_core.c
>> @@ -2454,14 +2454,17 @@ e1000e_set_ics(E1000ECore *core, int index, uint32_t 
>> val)
>>  static void
>>  e1000e_set_icr(E1000ECore *core, int index, uint32_t val)
>>  {
>> +    uint32_t icr = 0;
>>      if ((core->mac[ICR] & E1000_ICR_ASSERTED) &&
>>          (core->mac[CTRL_EXT] & E1000_CTRL_EXT_IAME)) {
>>          trace_e1000e_irq_icr_process_iame();
>>          e1000e_clear_ims_bits(core, core->mac[IAM]);
>>      }
>>  
>> -    trace_e1000e_irq_icr_write(val, core->mac[ICR], core->mac[ICR] & ~val);
>> -    core->mac[ICR] &= ~val;
>> +    icr = core->mac[ICR] & ~val;
>> +    icr = (val & E1000_ICR_OTHER) ? (icr & ~E1000_ICR_OTHER_CAUSES) : icr;
>> +    trace_e1000e_irq_icr_write(val, core->mac[ICR], icr);
>> +    core->mac[ICR] = icr;
>>      e1000e_update_interrupt_state(core);
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.8.1.185.gdc0db2c
>>
>>
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
> 

Cc: address@hidden