[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH] ACPI: don't call acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb on
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH] ACPI: don't call acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb on xen |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:27:12 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Bruce Rogers wrote:
> >>> On 4/27/2017 at 03:09 PM, Stefano Stabellini <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Bruce Rogers wrote:
> >> Commit f0c9d64a exposed the issue that with a xenfv machine using
> >> pci passthrough, acpi cpi hotplug code was being executed by mistake.
> >> Guard calls to acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb (and corresponding
> >> acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_cb) with a check for xen_enabled(). Without
> >> this check I am seeing an error that the bus doesn't have the
> >> acpi-pcihp-bsel property set.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> hw/acpi/piix4.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/acpi/piix4.c b/hw/acpi/piix4.c
> >> index a553a7e..c409374 100644
> >> --- a/hw/acpi/piix4.c
> >> +++ b/hw/acpi/piix4.c
> >> @@ -385,7 +385,10 @@ static void piix4_device_plug_cb(HotplugHandler
> > *hotplug_dev,
> >> dev, errp);
> >> }
> >> } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PCI_DEVICE)) {
> >> - acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb(hotplug_dev, &s->acpi_pci_hotplug, dev,
> > errp);
> >> + if (!xen_enabled()) {
> >> + acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb(hotplug_dev, &s->acpi_pci_hotplug,
> >> dev,
> >> + errp);
> >> + }
> >> } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU)) {
> >> if (s->cpu_hotplug_legacy) {
> >> legacy_acpi_cpu_plug_cb(hotplug_dev, &s->gpe_cpu, dev, errp);
> >> @@ -408,8 +411,10 @@ static void
> > piix4_device_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> >> acpi_memory_unplug_request_cb(hotplug_dev,
> >> &s->acpi_memory_hotplug,
> >> dev, errp);
> >> } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PCI_DEVICE)) {
> >> - acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_cb(hotplug_dev, &s->acpi_pci_hotplug,
> >> dev,
> >> - errp);
> >> + if (!xen_enabled()) {
> >> + acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_cb(hotplug_dev,
> >> &s->acpi_pci_hotplug,
> > dev,
> >> + errp);
> >> + }
> >> } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU) &&
> >> !s->cpu_hotplug_legacy) {
> >> acpi_cpu_unplug_request_cb(hotplug_dev, &s->cpuhp_state, dev,
> >> errp);
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to simply turn the error_setg("Unsupported bus...)
> > in acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb and acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_cb into debug
> > printfs? After all, from this description it is clear that they are not
> > an error conditions. PCI Passthough works correctly, right?
> >
> > I realize that I should have suggested this earlier, sorry about that.
>
> I don't think we want to be running through qemu acpi code any more than is
> necessary when using xen hvm.
Fair enough, but at the same time it is not good to disseminate if
(!xen_enabled()) around. I am happy either way, I'll let Michael and
Igor decide.