[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000e: correctly tear down MSI-X
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000e: correctly tear down MSI-X memory regions |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:05:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 09/03/2017 12:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> MSI-X has been disabled by the time the e1000e device is unrealized, hence
> msix_uninit is never called. This causes the object to be leaked, which
> shows up as a RAMBlock with empty name when attempting migration.
>
> Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> Cc: Jason Wang <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/net/e1000e.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/e1000e.c b/hw/net/e1000e.c
> index b0f429b..6e23493 100644
> --- a/hw/net/e1000e.c
> +++ b/hw/net/e1000e.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ e1000e_init_msix(E1000EState *s)
> static void
> e1000e_cleanup_msix(E1000EState *s)
> {
> - if (msix_enabled(PCI_DEVICE(s))) {
> + if (msix_present(PCI_DEVICE(s))) {
> e1000e_unuse_msix_vectors(s, E1000E_MSIX_VEC_NUM);
> msix_uninit(PCI_DEVICE(s), &s->msix, &s->msix);
> }
>
Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>