[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFT qom-cpu for-next] gdbstub: Fix
From: |
Max Filippov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFT qom-cpu for-next] gdbstub: Fix gdb_register_coprocessor() register counting |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:21:53 +0400 |
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 12.08.2013 19:22, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> Commit a0e372f0c49ac01faeaeb73a6e8f50e8ac615f34 reorganized the register
>> counting for GDB. While it seems correct not to let the total number of
>> registers skyrocket in an SMP scenario through a static variable, the
>> distinction between total register count and 'g' packet register count
>> (last_reg vs. num_g_regs) got lost among the way.
>>
>> Fix this by introducing CPUState::gdb_num_g_regs and using that in
>> gdb_handle_packet().
>>
>> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden (for 1.6)
>> Cc: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Max Filippov <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> gdbstub.c | 6 ++++--
>> include/qom/cpu.h | 2 ++
>> qom/cpu.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Ping!
>
> Peter, could you verify the ARM FP registers are now as expected?
>
> Max, could you test xtensa as the special case?
Tested, appears to be good.
--
Thanks.
-- Max