[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 09/21] target/m68k: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule
|
From: |
Peter Maydell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 09/21] target/m68k: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:10:08 +0000 |
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 15:13, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Explicitly set the 2-NaN propagation rule on env->fp_status
> and on the temporary fp_status that we use in frem (since
> we pass that to a division operation function).
> ---
> target/m68k/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> target/m68k/fpu_helper.c | 1 +
> fpu/softfloat-specialize.c.inc | 19 +------------------
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Whoops, Laurent pointed out I forgot to add a signed-off-by
on this patch, so here it is:
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
-- PMM
- Re: [PATCH 04/21] target/mips: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule, (continued)
- [PATCH 06/21] target/hppa: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25
- [PATCH 05/21] target/loongarch: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25
- [PATCH 08/21] target/ppc: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25
- [PATCH 09/21] target/m68k: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25
- [PATCH 10/21] target/m68k: Initialize float_status fields in gdb set/get functions, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25
- [PATCH 07/21] target/s390x: Explicitly set 2-NaN propagation rule, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25
- [PATCH 11/21] target/sparc: Move cpu_put_fsr(env, 0) call to reset, Peter Maydell, 2024/10/25