[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 h
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:02:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 17.09.24 12:50, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 17.09.24 12:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 12.09.24 15:22, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 19:57 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's generalize, abstracting the virtio bits. diag500 is now a generic
hypercall to handle QEMU/KVM specific things. Explicitly specify all
already defined subcodes, including legacy ones (so we know what we can
use for new hypercalls).
We'll rename the files separately, so git properly detects the rename.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c | 8 ++++----
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h | 11 ++++++-----
target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 10 ++--------
target/s390x/tcg/misc_helper.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
[...]
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index 94181d9281..ac292b184a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -1493,16 +1493,10 @@ static int handle_e3(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
uint8_t ipbl)
static int handle_hypercall(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
Might as well make the return type void then.
Agreed.
More importantly, are you changing the behavior?
If I'm reading the code right, previously handle_instruction would inject an
additional PGM_OPERATION due to the negative return value, which does seem off
to me.
If so, IMO this change should go into a separate patch.
You are right, agreed.
Ah, reading again, we have a "return 0;" after the
"kvm_s390_program_interrupt", so it should work as expected.
The following in should be what you suggest:
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
index 4cddf69fbb..5fb78a719e 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
@@ -57,18 +57,19 @@ static int handle_virtio_ccw_notify(uint64_t subch_id,
uint64_t data)
return 0;
}
-int handle_diag_500(CPUS390XState *env)
+void handle_diag_500(S390CPU *cpu, uintptr_t ra)
{
+ CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
const uint64_t subcode = env->regs[1];
switch (subcode) {
case DIAG500_VIRTIO_NOTIFY:
env->regs[2] = handle_virtio_notify(env->regs[2]);
- return 0;
+ break;
case DIAG500_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY:
env->regs[2] = handle_virtio_ccw_notify(env->regs[2], env->regs[3]);
- return 0;
+ break;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
}
}
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
index e4f76aca82..dca456b926 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
@@ -19,6 +19,6 @@
#define DIAG500_VIRTIO_SET_STATUS 2 /* legacy */
#define DIAG500_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY 3 /* KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY */
-int handle_diag_500(CPUS390XState *env);
+void handle_diag_500(S390CPU *cpu, uintptr_t ra);
#endif /* HW_S390_VIRTIO_HCALL_H */
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index ac292b184a..2f9a54fe04 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -1491,14 +1491,6 @@ static int handle_e3(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
uint8_t ipbl)
return r;
}
-static int handle_hypercall(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
-{
- if (handle_diag_500(&cpu->env)) {
- kvm_s390_program_interrupt(cpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
static void kvm_handle_diag_288(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
uint64_t r1, r3;
@@ -1595,7 +1587,7 @@ static int handle_diag(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
uint32_t ipb)
handle_diag_318(cpu, run);
break;
case DIAG_KVM_HYPERCALL:
- r = handle_hypercall(cpu, run);
+ handle_diag_500(cpu, RA_IGNORED)
break;
case DIAG_KVM_BREAKPOINT:
r = handle_sw_breakpoint(cpu, run);
diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/misc_helper.c
index 58757585a2..170fe00629 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/misc_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/misc_helper.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void HELPER(diag)(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t r1, uint32_t
r3, uint32_t num)
case 0x500:
/* QEMU/KVM hypercall */
bql_lock();
- r = handle_diag_500(env);
+ handle_diag_500(env_archcpu(env), GETPC());
bql_unlock();
break;
case 0x44:
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
- Re: [PATCH v1 01/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: don't crash on weird RAM sizes, (continued)
[PATCH v1 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism, David Hildenbrand, 2024/09/10
[PATCH v1 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls, David Hildenbrand, 2024/09/10
[PATCH v1 05/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: move setting the maximum guest size from sclp to machine code, David Hildenbrand, 2024/09/10
[PATCH v1 04/14] s390x: rename s390-virtio-hcall* to s390-hypercall*, David Hildenbrand, 2024/09/10
[PATCH v1 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit(), David Hildenbrand, 2024/09/10