qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 12/12] hw/sysbus: Ensure device is realized before mapping it


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] hw/sysbus: Ensure device is realized before mapping it
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:13:41 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 18/10/2023 16.11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
sysbus_mmio_map() should not be called on unrealized device.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
  hw/core/sysbus.c | 8 ++++++++
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/core/sysbus.c b/hw/core/sysbus.c
index ce54e2c416..a46828a808 100644
--- a/hw/core/sysbus.c
+++ b/hw/core/sysbus.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
  #include "qapi/error.h"
  #include "qemu/module.h"
+#include "qemu/error-report.h"

I assume this hunk should go into the previous patch?

  #include "hw/sysbus.h"
  #include "monitor/monitor.h"
  #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
@@ -132,6 +133,13 @@ static void sysbus_mmio_map_common(SysBusDevice *dev, int 
n, hwaddr addr,
  {
      assert(n >= 0 && n < dev->num_mmio);
+ if (!DEVICE(dev)->realized) {
+        error_report("sysbus_mmio_map(type:%s, index:%d, 
addr:0x%"HWADDR_PRIx","
+                     " prio:%d) but object is not realized",
+                     object_get_typename(OBJECT(dev)), n, addr, priority);
+        abort();
+    }

With the hunk moved (or the order of the patches reversed):

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]