[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v23 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics
From: |
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v23 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:51:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) |
On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 14:47 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > S390 adds two new SMP levels, drawers and books to the CPU
> > topology.
> > S390 CPUs have specific topology features like dedication and
> > entitlement. These indicate to the guest information on host
> > vCPU scheduling and help the guest make better scheduling decisions.
> >
> > Let us provide the SMP properties with books and drawers levels
> > and S390 CPU with dedication and entitlement,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > qapi/machine-common.json | 21 +++++++++++++
> > qapi/machine.json | 19 ++++++++++--
> > include/hw/boards.h | 10 +++++-
> > include/hw/qdev-properties-system.h | 4 +++
> > target/s390x/cpu.h | 6 ++++
> > hw/core/machine-smp.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > hw/core/machine.c | 4 +++
> > hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c | 13 ++++++++
> > hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 4 +++
> > softmmu/vl.c | 6 ++++
> > target/s390x/cpu.c | 7 +++++
> > qapi/meson.build | 1 +
> > qemu-options.hx | 7 +++--
> > 13 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 qapi/machine-common.json
> >
> > diff --git a/qapi/machine-common.json b/qapi/machine-common.json
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..e40421bb37
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/qapi/machine-common.json
>
> Why do you need a separate QAPI sub-module?
See here
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/d8da6f7d1e3addcb63614f548ed77ac1b8895e63.camel@linux.ibm.com/
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +# -*- Mode: Python -*-
> > +# vim: filetype=python
> > +#
> > +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> > +# See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > +
> > +##
> > +# = Machines S390 data types
> > +##
> > +
> > +##
> > +# @CpuS390Entitlement:
> > +#
> > +# An enumeration of cpu entitlements that can be assumed by a virtual
> > +# S390 CPU
> > +#
> > +# Since: 8.2
> > +##
> > +{ 'enum': 'CpuS390Entitlement',
> > + 'prefix': 'S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT',
> > + 'data': [ 'auto', 'low', 'medium', 'high' ] }
> > diff --git a/qapi/machine.json b/qapi/machine.json
> > index a08b6576ca..a63cb951d2 100644
> > --- a/qapi/machine.json
> > +++ b/qapi/machine.json
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> ##
> # = Machines
> > ##
> >
> > { 'include': 'common.json' }
> > +{ 'include': 'machine-common.json' }
>
> Section structure is borked :)
>
> Existing section "Machine" now ends at the new "Machines S390 data
> types" you pull in here. The contents of below moves from "Machines" to
> "Machines S390 data types".
>
> Before I explain how to avoid this, I'd like to understand why we need a
> new sub-module.
>
> >
> > ##
> > # @SysEmuTarget:
> > @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@
> ##
> # @CpuInfoFast:
> #
> # Information about a virtual CPU
> #
> # @cpu-index: index of the virtual CPU
> #
> # @qom-path: path to the CPU object in the QOM tree
> > #
> > # @thread-id: ID of the underlying host thread
> > #
> > -# @props: properties describing to which node/socket/core/thread
> > +# @props: properties describing to which
> > node/drawer/book/socket/core/thread
> > # virtual CPU belongs to, provided if supported by board
>
> Is this description accurate?
Kinda, although the wording might not be the best.
All the CpuInstanceProperties fields are optional, it's like a superset of
possible
properties across architectures.
Only a subset might be returned by query-cpus-fast.
Also die and cluster are missing.
>
> @props is of type CpuInstanceProperties, shown below. Its documentation
> describes it as "properties to be used for hotplugging a CPU instance,
> it should be passed by management with device_add command when a CPU is
> being hotplugged." Hmm.
>
> I figure details ("node/drawer/book/socket/core/thread") are better left
> to CpuInstanceProperties.
>
> The "provided if supported by board" part makes no sense to me. If
> @props is there, it lists the properties we need to provide with
> device_add. What if it's not there? Same as empty list, i.e. we don't
> need to provide properties with device_add?
There are default values/default logic.
For s390x, socket, book, drawer are calculated from the core id
if not provided with device_add.
Partial specifications are rejected.
>
> Not your patch's fault, but let's get this in shape if we can.
>
> > #
> > # @target: the QEMU system emulation target, which determines which
> > @@ -901,7 +902,11 @@
> > #
> > # @node-id: NUMA node ID the CPU belongs to
> > #
> > -# @socket-id: socket number within node/board the CPU belongs to
> > +# @drawer-id: drawer number within node/board the CPU belongs to (since
> > 8.2)
> > +#
> > +# @book-id: book number within drawer/node/board the CPU belongs to (since
> > 8.2)
>
> Long lines, please wrap:
>
> # @drawer-id: drawer number within node/board the CPU belongs to
> # (since 8.2)
> #
> # @book-id: book number within drawer/node/board the CPU belongs to
> # (since 8.2)
Ok.
>
> > +#
> > +# @socket-id: socket number within book/node/board the CPU belongs to
> > #
> > # @die-id: die number within socket the CPU belongs to (since 4.1)
> > #
> > @@ -912,7 +917,7 @@
> ##
> # @CpuInstanceProperties:
> #
> # List of properties to be used for hotplugging a CPU instance, it
> # should be passed by management with device_add command when a CPU is
> # being hotplugged.
> #
> # @node-id: NUMA node ID the CPU belongs to
> #
> # @socket-id: socket number within node/board the CPU belongs to
> #
> # @die-id: die number within socket the CPU belongs to (since 4.1)
> #
> # @cluster-id: cluster number within die the CPU belongs to (since
> # 7.1)
> #
> # @core-id: core number within cluster the CPU belongs to
> > #
> > # @thread-id: thread number within core the CPU belongs to
> > #
> > -# Note: currently there are 6 properties that could be present but
> > +# Note: currently there are 8 properties that could be present but
> > # management should be prepared to pass through other properties
> > # with device_add command to allow for future interface extension.
> > # This also requires the filed names to be kept in sync with the
> # properties passed to -device/device_add.
>
> The last sentence is for developers, not for users, which means it
> doesn't belong here. Suggest to move it to a non-doc comment, and
> rephrase the note like
>
> # Note: management should be prepared to pass through additional
> # properties with device_add.
>
> > @@ -922,6 +927,8 @@
> > ##
> > { 'struct': 'CpuInstanceProperties',
>
> Non-doc comment could go here:
>
> # Keep these in sync with the properties device_add accepts
>
> Again, not your patch's fault, but your help improving this stuff would
> be appreciated.
>
> > 'data': { '*node-id': 'int',
> > + '*drawer-id': 'int',
> > + '*book-id': 'int',
> > '*socket-id': 'int',
> > '*die-id': 'int',
> > '*cluster-id': 'int',
> '*core-id': 'int',
> '*thread-id': 'int'
> }
> }
>
[...]
- [PATCH v23 18/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full, (continued)
- [PATCH v23 18/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 06/20] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 09/20] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 05/20] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 14/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 17/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- [PATCH v23 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
- Re: [PATCH v23 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/25
- Re: [PATCH v23 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics, Markus Armbruster, 2023/09/25
Re: [PATCH v23 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics, Markus Armbruster, 2023/09/20
[PATCH v23 20/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14
[PATCH v23 11/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, 2023/09/14