|
| From: | Pierre Morel |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v21 03/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:24:26 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
On 7/4/23 13:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 30/06/2023 11.17, Pierre Morel wrote:On interception of STSI(15.1.x) the System Information Block (SYSIB) is built from the list of pre-ordered topology entries. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> ---...diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h index 7ebd5e05b6..6e7d041b01 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h @@ -569,6 +569,29 @@ typedef struct SysIB_322 { } SysIB_322; QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_322) != 4096); +/* + * Topology Magnitude fields (MAG) indicates the maximum number of + * topology list entries (TLE) at the corresponding nesting level. + */ +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG 6 +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG6 0 +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG5 1 +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG4 2 +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3 3 +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2 4 +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1 5 +/* Configuration topology */ +typedef struct SysIB_151x { + uint8_t reserved0[2]; + uint16_t length; + uint8_t mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG]; + uint8_t reserved1; + uint8_t mnest; + uint32_t reserved2; + char tle[]; +} SysIB_151x; +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_151x) != 16); + typedef union SysIB { SysIB_111 sysib_111; SysIB_121 sysib_121; @@ -576,9 +599,62 @@ typedef union SysIB { SysIB_221 sysib_221; SysIB_222 sysib_222; SysIB_322 sysib_322; + SysIB_151x sysib_151x; } SysIB; QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB) != 4096); +/* + * CPU Topology List provided by STSI with fc=15 provides a list + * of two different Topology List Entries (TLE) types to specify + * the topology hierarchy. + * + * - Container Topology List Entry + * Defines a container to contain other Topology List Entries + * of any type, nested containers or CPU. + * - CPU Topology List Entry + * Specifies the CPUs position, type, entitlement and polarization + * of the CPUs contained in the last Container TLE. + * + * There can be theoretically up to five levels of containers, QEMU + * uses only three levels, the drawer's, book's and socket's level. + * + * A container with a nesting level (NL) greater than 1 can only + * contain another container of nesting level NL-1. + * + * A container of nesting level 1 (socket), contains as many CPU TLE + * as needed to describe the position and qualities of all CPUs inside + * the container. + * The qualities of a CPU are polarization, entitlement and type. + * + * The CPU TLE defines the position of the CPUs of identical qualities + * using a 64bits mask which first bit has its offset defined by + * the CPU address orgin field of the CPU TLE like in: + * CPU address = origin * 64 + bit position within the mask + * + */ +/* Container type Topology List Entry */ +typedef struct SysIBTl_container { + uint8_t nl; + uint8_t reserved[6]; + uint8_t id; +} SysIBTl_container;Why mixing CamelCase with underscore-style here? SysIBTlContainer would look more natural, I think?
OK, what about SYSIBContainerListEntry ?
+QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIBTl_container) != 8); + +/* CPU type Topology List Entry */ +typedef struct SysIBTl_cpu { + uint8_t nl; + uint8_t reserved0[3]; +#define SYSIB_TLE_POLARITY_MASK 0x03 +#define SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED 0x04 + uint8_t flags; + uint8_t type; + uint16_t origin; + uint64_t mask; +} SysIBTl_cpu;dito, maybe better SysIBTlCpu ?
What about SysIBCPUListEntry ?
+QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIBTl_cpu) != 16); ++void insert_stsi_15_1_x(S390CPU *cpu, int sel2, uint64_t addr, uint8_t ar);+ /* MMU defines */#define ASCE_ORIGIN (~0xfffULL) /* segment table origin */ #define ASCE_SUBSPACE 0x200 /* subspace group control */diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c index b163c17f8f..ca1634d0ce 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c @@ -29,11 +29,13 @@ * .cores_per_socket: tracks information on the count of cores * per socket. * .smp: keeps track of the machine topology. - * + * .list: queue the topology entries inside which + * we keep the information on the CPU topology.The comment does not match the code below.
a left over I modify this. Thanks.
*/ S390Topology s390_topology = { /* will be initialized after the cpu model is realized */ .cores_per_socket = NULL, + .polarization = S390_CPU_POLARIZATION_HORIZONTAL, }; /** diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c index 3ac7ec9acf..5ea358cbb0 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c @@ -1919,9 +1919,12 @@ static int handle_stsi(S390CPU *cpu) if (run->s390_stsi.sel1 != 2 || run->s390_stsi.sel2 != 2) { return 0; } - /* Only sysib 3.2.2 needs post-handling for now. */insert_stsi_3_2_2(cpu, run->s390_stsi.addr, run->s390_stsi.ar);return 0; + case 15:+ insert_stsi_15_1_x(cpu, run->s390_stsi.sel2, run->s390_stsi.addr,+ run->s390_stsi.ar); + return 0; default: return 0; }diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/stsi-topology.c b/target/s390x/kvm/stsi-topology.cnew file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0b789450da --- /dev/null +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/stsi-topology.c @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* + * QEMU S390x CPU Topology + * + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022,2023 + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> + * + */ +#include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include "cpu.h" +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h" +#include "hw/sysbus.h" +#include "hw/s390x/sclp.h" +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h" + +/** + * fill_container: + * @p: The address of the container TLE to fill + * @level: The level of nesting for this container + * @id: The container receives a unique ID inside its own container + * + * Returns the next free TLE entry. + */ +static char *fill_container(char *p, int level, int id) +{ + SysIBTl_container *tle = (SysIBTl_container *)p; + + tle->nl = level; + tle->id = id; + return p + sizeof(*tle); +} + +/** + * fill_tle_cpu: + * @p: The address of the CPU TLE to fill + * @entry: a pointer to the S390TopologyEntry defining this + * CPU container. + * + * Returns the next free TLE entry. + */ +static char *fill_tle_cpu(char *p, S390TopologyEntry *entry) +{ + SysIBTl_cpu *tle = (SysIBTl_cpu *)p; + s390_topology_id topology_id = entry->id; + + tle->nl = 0; + if (topology_id.dedicated) { + tle->flags = SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED; + } + tle->flags |= topology_id.entitlement;If it was not dedicated, the "|=" might operate with a random value here. Better pre-initialize flags with 0, or change the order of the operations here:tle->flags = topology_id.entitlement; if (topology_id.dedicated) { tle->flags |= SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED; }
oh, yes.
+ tle->type = topology_id.type; + tle->origin = cpu_to_be16(topology_id.origin * 64); + tle->mask = cpu_to_be64(entry->mask); + return p + sizeof(*tle); +} + +/* + * Macro to check that the size of data after increment + * will not get bigger than the size of the SysIB. + */ +#define SYSIB_GUARD(data, x) do { \ + data += x; \ + if (data > sizeof(SysIB)) { \ + return 0; \ + } \ + } while (0) + +/** + * stsi_topology_fill_sysib: + * @p: A pointer to the position of the first TLE + * @level: The nested level wanted by the guest + * + * Fill the SYSIB with the topology information as described in + * the PoP, nesting containers as appropriate, with the maximum + * nesting limited by @level. + * + * Return value: + * On success: the size of the SysIB_15x after being filled with TLE. + * On error: 0 in the case we would overrun the end of the SysIB. + */ +static int stsi_topology_fill_sysib(S390TopologyList *topology_list, + char *p, int level) +{ + S390TopologyEntry *entry; + int last_drawer = -1; + int last_book = -1; + int last_socket = -1; + int drawer_id = 0; + int book_id = 0; + int socket_id = 0; + int n = sizeof(SysIB_151x); + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(entry, topology_list, next) { + bool drawer_change = last_drawer != entry->id.drawer;+ bool book_change = drawer_change || last_book != entry->id.book; + bool socket_change = book_change || last_socket != entry->id.socket;+ + /* If we reach the sentinel get out */ + if (entry->id.sentinel) { + break; + } + + if (level > 3 && drawer_change) { + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_container)); + p = fill_container(p, 3, drawer_id++); + book_id = 0; + } + if (level > 2 && book_change) { + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_container)); + p = fill_container(p, 2, book_id++); + socket_id = 0; + } + if (socket_change) { + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_container)); + p = fill_container(p, 1, socket_id++); + } + + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_cpu)); + p = fill_tle_cpu(p, entry); + last_drawer = entry->id.drawer; + last_book = entry->id.book; + last_socket = entry->id.socket; + } + + return n; +} + +/** + * setup_stsi: + * sysib: pointer to a SysIB to be filled with SysIB_151x data + * level: Nested level specified by the guest + * + * Setup the SYSIB for STSI 15.1, the header as well as the description + * of the topology. + */+static int setup_stsi(S390TopologyList *topology_list, SysIB_151x *sysib,+ int level) +{ + sysib->mnest = level; + switch (level) { + case 4: + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG4] = current_machine->smp.drawers; + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3] = current_machine->smp.books; + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2] = current_machine->smp.sockets; + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1] = current_machine->smp.cores; + break; + case 3: + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3] = current_machine->smp.drawers * + current_machine->smp.books; + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2] = current_machine->smp.sockets; + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1] = current_machine->smp.cores; + break; + case 2: + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2] = current_machine->smp.drawers * + current_machine->smp.books * + current_machine->smp.sockets; + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1] = current_machine->smp.cores; + break; + } + + return stsi_topology_fill_sysib(topology_list, sysib->tle, level); +} + +/** + * s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry: + * @entry: Topology entry to setup + * @cpu: the S390CPU to add + * + * Set the core bit inside the topology mask and + * increments the number of cores for the socket.The second part of the sentence does not seem to be done here anymore?
Right, it is not needed here anymore since this is doe during the STSI interception.
It was needed during the setup of the topology or during changes, hotplug or moving a CPU,
which is done in hw/s390/cpu.topology.c
+ */ +static void s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry(S390TopologyEntry *entry, + S390CPU *cpu) +{ + set_bit(63 - (cpu->env.core_id % 64), &entry->mask); +} + +/** + * s390_topology_from_cpu: + * @cpu: The S390CPU + * + * Initialize the topology id from the CPU environment. + */ +static s390_topology_id s390_topology_from_cpu(S390CPU *cpu) +{ + s390_topology_id topology_id = {0}; + + topology_id.drawer = cpu->env.drawer_id; + topology_id.book = cpu->env.book_id; + topology_id.socket = cpu->env.socket_id; + topology_id.origin = cpu->env.core_id / 64; + topology_id.type = S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_IFL; + topology_id.dedicated = cpu->env.dedicated; + + if (s390_topology.polarization == S390_CPU_POLARIZATION_VERTICAL) { + topology_id.entitlement = cpu->env.entitlement; + } + + return topology_id; +} + +/** + * s390_topology_insert: + * @cpu: s390CPU insert."s390CPU insert" sounds like a weird description for @cpu
yes I think "S390CPU to be inserted in the topology list" is better
+ * + * Parse the topology list to find if the entry already + * exist and add the core in it. + * If it does not exist, allocate a new entry and insert + * it in the queue from lower id to greater id. + */+static void s390_topology_insert(S390TopologyList *topology_list, S390CPU *cpu)+{ + s390_topology_id id = s390_topology_from_cpu(cpu); + S390TopologyEntry *entry = NULL; + S390TopologyEntry *tmp = NULL; + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(tmp, topology_list, next) { + if (id.id == tmp->id.id) { + s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry(tmp, cpu); + return; + } else if (id.id < tmp->id.id) { + entry = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390TopologyEntry)); + entry->id.id = id.id; + s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry(entry, cpu); + QTAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(tmp, entry, next); + return; + } + } +} + +/** + * s390_topology_fill_list_sorted: + * + * Loop over all CPU and insert it at the right place + * inside the TLE entry list. + * Fill the S390Topology list with entries according to the order + * specified by the PoP. + */+static void s390_topology_fill_list_sorted(S390TopologyList *topology_list)+{ + CPUState *cs; + + CPU_FOREACH(cs) { + s390_topology_insert(topology_list, S390_CPU(cs)); + } +} + +/** + * s390_topology_empty_list: + * + * Clear all entries in the S390Topology list except the sentinel. + */ +static void s390_topology_empty_list(S390TopologyList *topology_list) +{ + S390TopologyEntry *entry = NULL; + S390TopologyEntry *tmp = NULL; + + QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(entry, topology_list, next, tmp) { + QTAILQ_REMOVE(topology_list, entry, next); + g_free(entry); + } +} + +/** + * insert_stsi_15_1_x: + * cpu: the CPU doing the call for which we set CC + * sel2: the selector 2, containing the nested level + * addr: Guest logical address of the guest SysIB + * ar: the access register number + * + * Create a list head for the Topology entries and initialize it.s/Topology/topology/
OK
+ * Insert the first entry as a sentinelle.s/sentinelle/sentinel/
thx
+ * Emulate STSI 15.1.x, that is, perform all necessary checks and + * fill the SYSIB. + * In case the topology description is too long to fit into the SYSIB, + * set CC=3 and abort without writing the SYSIB. + */+void insert_stsi_15_1_x(S390CPU *cpu, int sel2, uint64_t addr, uint8_t ar)+{ + S390TopologyList topology_list; + S390TopologyEntry *entry; + SysIB sysib = {0}; + int length; ++ if (!s390_has_topology() || sel2 < 2 || sel2 > SCLP_READ_SCP_INFO_MNEST) {+ setcc(cpu, 3); + return; + } + + QTAILQ_INIT(&topology_list); + entry = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390TopologyEntry)); + entry->id.sentinel = 0xff; + QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&topology_list, entry, next); + + s390_topology_fill_list_sorted(&topology_list); + + length = setup_stsi(&topology_list, &sysib.sysib_151x, sel2); + + if (!length) { + setcc(cpu, 3);
I forgot to free the buffers here... will be added like
if (!length) {
s390_topology_empty_list(&topology_list);
setcc(cpu, 3);
return;
}
+ return; + } + + sysib.sysib_151x.length = cpu_to_be16(length); + s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, length); + setcc(cpu, 0);s390_cpu_virt_mem_write() could fail, I think in that case you should not change the CC value here?
right, thanks. Regards, Pierre
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |